Hello Vortexx,
You have posted a really good bunch of questions here.
You have also posted a bunch of responses and opinions too.
And I’m glad of it but it does bring up something that I just can’t shake.
First,
1. You asked about the Seattle area schools.
On here, it seems to me that I read about a student from there who was satisfied with the instruction he received at TKF. It seems to me he had looked around and found none that suited his needs as well as TKF. When I find the post I’ll let you know.
As an aside;
Here is a link to Elizabeth Truit’s web account on the martial arts in Seattle, circa November of 1999. Under Kung fu there is even a mention of Temple.
http://www.slate.com/default.aspx?id=55898
2. You posted, “I'm sure Mrs. Simon voiced her thoughts on how she thought things should be run, and she may have been very authoritative in doing so.”
How authoritive was she and for how long, exactly?
3. You posted,” But in the end it was still up to each owner/master to run his studios how he chose.”
Was it?
Did she have any powers over these people?
I’m not being rude or obnoxious here.
I’m trying to more fully understand her role(s) in Moh and TKF/SKS.
4. You posted, “Sparrow blaming his bankruptcy on Mrs. Simon doesn't add up and sounds more like an excuse to me.”
Why did Mr. Sparrrow blame “Mrs. Simon" and not Olaf?
(I know that is not really a question you can answer but I’m hoping someone else can.)
Now you said your post was mostly about TKF after the Simon’s sold their shares.
None the less, I keep coming back to this in your post.
The Thing about Your Post That I Cannot Shake
Did no one make it (outside of TKF in Edmonton and Calgary)?
Did Messer’s Sparrow, Weber and Jones etc receive such poor business practices from TKF that they all failed?
I mean, if Mrs, Simon was so authoritive, when she was in charge, then why did all these guys fail when they went on their own?
Regards, MrE2Me2
Without prejudice
E&OE