View Full Version: MODERN HISTORY OF SHAOLIN

templekungforum >>Kenpo Connection >>MODERN HISTORY OF SHAOLIN


grasshopper- 09-20-2006
MODERN HISTORY OF SHAOLIN
This is from a different thread on the forum but I found it so informative that I created a new thread just for it... ... I talked to a Shaolin Monk the other day he said he trained in the traditional Shaolin way, he told me others train in the more modern Wu Shu style etc, Here is his remarks to me and his link,. I met him in Toronto. "Hello Bruce, Thank you for you inquiry. To answer your question, there is some grain of truth to what Mr. Carver is saying. However, his comments are skewed as someone who is not intimately involved with the Chinese martial arts community and are misleading. The cultural revolution did occur where the government did try and wipe out all forms of traditional Chinese martial arts (TCMA). They did this by enslaving many great masters into working camps. The government back-tracked realizing it had made a mistake and then tried to revive the practice (it was rumored that Japan had challenged China to a friendly martial arts competition and China lost). What occured afterwards greatly impacted Chinese martial arts today. The government tried to rally the remaining masters to work together and revive the art, but what happened was 3 schools of thought emerged: 1) One group of masters were totally on board and decided to pool their talents to create a new art, known today as wushu (Contemporary Chinese Martial Arts - CCMA). It is characterized by lots of running, high jumping, acrobatics. Think gymnastic floor routines intermingled with martial arts. Everything was standardized and it's goal was primarily for sport and performance to promote culture. 2) Opposite was a group of masters who were simply set in their ways and didn't want anything to do with this collaboration; nor did they want to share any of their information. They were absolutely traditional and remained rooted in the old ways. 3) Another group of masters saw the benefit of sharing information to broaden their horizons and saw the benefit of collaboration but still recognized the importance of traditional values. Our Master Lee was fortunte enough to have started training under his grand-father in his own family's traditional style called Lee Family Southern Way Fist. As his grand-father was well associated with other masters in the 3rd school of thought that I outlined above, Master Lee then went on to become the disciple of 9 different Masters of various styles of TCMA. Through these masters, he went on to network and learn from other influential masters of TCMA. One of those masters was the honourable Master Shi Suxi (previous Grand Abbott of the Shaolin Temple). Although Master Lee's physical training was under Master Shi Suxi's disciples, he eventually was ordained 31st Generation Warrior Monk status directly under Master Shi Suxi in 2000. Although many recent "monks" have also received this title, many have been taught basic forms/CCMA in the "public" training hall and have been given the title to act as "ambassadors" to the Shaolin Temple for their respective country. Master Lee however is one of the very few who was also granted exclusive TCMA material and training in the Temple's "private" training hall. Throughout Master Lee's years of education in Chinese martial arts, he has adamantly sought out to train TCMA and purposely stayed away from CCMA as he has come to the understanding that sport/performance is only a small piece of what martial arts, as whole, has to offer. Returning to Mr. Carvers comments: The modern "Shaolin Temple", in my opinion, is setup as a tourist attraction simply because in today's society, money is required for everything. There is a lot of upkeep and costs tied to the operation and they have been forced to follow modern economics in order to keep up the promotion of their "art". When travelling groups of monks visit and perform outside of China, sometimes they are auditioned or taken from various Shaolin "feeder schools". The Shaolin Temple holds "auditions" each year and accept only a handful of individuals to become full Shaolin Monks. As a result, "feeder schools" are prolific in the region and many students aspire to become a monk via a "feeder school" by studying a regiment of either TCMA or CCMA or both. What should be noted is that in many of these performances, CCMA (wushu) is showcased. Why? Because to the untrained eye, TCMA is not as exciting and flashy. The general public would rather see a person doing 720 spinning jump kicks and back flips rather than a properly delivered straight punch. The general public can't appreciate the complexity of traditional martial arts, let alone Chinese martial arts. The same problem occurs in Korean and Japanese martial arts. Karate is divided among sport and traditional, so is Taekwondo. How can you tell if a Shaolin monk knows TCMA or CCMA? In often cases, you can't until you've trained under them for quite some time. Sometimes, they purposely choose not to teach TCMA. Due to Master Lee's background in TCMA, our Shaolin program only teaches the TCMA embodied in the Shaolin style. It should also be noted that the Chung Wah Kung Fu International System also embodies many other famous, traditional styles such as Wing Chun, Preying Mantis, Hung Gar, etc. thus we are not only commited to promoting Shaolin, but all the other styles embodied in our program. To better understand our program, unique training methodology and philosophies, it's best to book an appointment with me so that we can continue our discussion on the true nature of martial arts. Please contact me if you are interested. In summation, Shaolin style kung fu has not been wiped out and the traditional knowledge is still available. Whether or not if someone is qualified or willing to teach you the knowledge is really the question. Regards, Charles Chang Chung Wah Kung Fu International System General Manager" http://www.chungwahkungfu.com/ga I think this sounds reasonable, many monks and teachers would have went into hiding in the Cultural revolution, and style like Hung Gar, Cho Li Fut etc would have remained as they do today and they can also trace their history back to Shaolin.

MrE2Me2- 09-22-2006

Modern History of Shaolin, To all, I am sure that the modern history of Shaolin is every bit as murky as the ancient history. There are those Kung fu Masters who fled to Hong Kong. As well, I once saw a documentary on Kung Fu in mainland China. It showed, among other things, an old man teaching a form to a younger man. Bruce posted, “I think this sounds reasonable, many monks and teachers would have went into hiding in the Cultural revolution, and style like Hung Gar, Cho Li Fut etc would have remained as they do today and they can also trace their history back to Shaolin.” This echoes what Charles Wang says, “In summation, Shaolin style kung fu has not been wiped out and the traditional knowledge is still available.” There are also those like this guy, Master Pan Qing Fu. “Unfortunately, he does not usually allow people to photograph him performing martial arts, since he considers his movements to be secrets of the trade”. http://www.charliet.net/masterpan/masterpan.htm Regards, MrE2Me2

Yen Hui- 09-24-2006

http://www.charliet.net/masterpan/masterpan.htm hi there MrE2Me2 ~ this link is'nt working for me. Is it working for anyone else?

MrE2Me2- 09-24-2006

Hello Yen Hui, The link worked for me. But try here on this google search of links about this Master. http://www.google.ca/search?q=Master+Pan+Qing+ Fu.+&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla: en-US:official Regards, MrE2Me2

Yen Hui- 09-24-2006

Thanks, Mr2E2Me2, but it's still a no go. I went to the Google webpage, as you suggested, and tried to link from there but could'nt get to it. If the problem persists, I'll contact my server about it. I saw Master Pan's big screen debut back in the earlier 90's, I think it was. I forgot he resided here in Ontario, and was training peole in the Shaolin Arts. I'll keep trying, as it may be worth my while to try and make his acquaintance. Who knows? Many kind regards! P.S. Keep those helpful KISAE vid clips rolling off the press. I'm sure enjoying them! :wink:

MrE2Me2- 09-24-2006

Hello Yen Hui, Thank you for your kind words. I shall endevor to keep filming. Sorry about the links. I don't know what to tell you. Regards, MrE2Me2

grasshopper- 09-25-2006

http://www.charliet.net/masterpan/masterpan.htm hi there MrE2Me2 ~ this link is'nt working for me. Is it working for anyone else? Works for me

Yen Hui- 09-26-2006

3rd day runnin' and it's still a no go for me. Weird! I'll contact my server later today about it, and if they don't get me connected, then they're out'a there!

rapier6360- 07-30-2008
Who is a Shaolin monk
Hi Just passing through and saw your forum. Don't know if anyone will read this old thread but WTH What this "Shaolin" says makes a lot of sense but no offense meant, I doubt he is a Shaolin. They have only recently been coming to north america and there are many who make false claims to being Chan Buddhist monks. The fact that he did not have the name of the previous abbot right is a clue. Ther are people in Pennsylvania, New York, and Los Angeles among others making claims. I can think of one in New York that was a monk (now married and a meat eater and party animal) and I believe there are a couple in Houston that have reasonable claims.The SF Bay Area seem to be the hot bed for the recent Monk migration from Shan Song temple. See www.shaolintempleusa.com

Forumer™ is Voted #1 Free Forum Hosting provider
Build your own community today with the largest message board hosting company.