Hello Yen Hui and Cam,
With all due respect to everyone.
Now see, this is how misunderstandings occur.
I believe that my posts have not been clear.
What I said about GMEP is this: "
Ed found that the traditional Kenpo system needed more modifications. Ultimately, his changes made up 85% of the system which he now call American Kenpo”.
http://www.psykenpology.org/lineage.htm
This is how he says he changed.
”
Parker also credited Chow for getting him to consider the notion of master key movements.
He says, "
Chow and I swapped a lot of infor- mation," he said. "He noticed a lot of thing; didn't work in an American en- vironment. He was the guy who started me thinking about master key move- ments and increasing my knowledge."
http://www.usadojo.com/articles/magician-motion.htm
And more on his particular changes.Concerning “Master Key Movements”:
“MASTER KEY TECHNIQUES entail sequential arrangements of movements that can be applied to a number of predicaments. In the case of a MASTER KEY TECHNIQUE it is a single technique that may be used as a BASE MOVE. Other similar techniques may then be perceived as formulations of it.”
http://www.martialtalk.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-10904.html
These are taken from a post here, in the thread about Richard Shergold.
http://templekungforum.14.forumer.com/viewtopic.php?t=28
To the best of my knowledge, GMEP used terms like “Mechanic of Motion” to describe
terms like ‘Disciple” and terms like “Magician of Motion” to describe terms like
“Master”.
When I can find a link to his ranking system, I’ll post it.
Yen Hui, you posted, “
…Ed Parker never produced any true masters, as he openly claimed (in an article that MrE2Me2 previously posted a link for) that he never taught
or transmitted his entire system to any of his disciples; out of fear that
one of them might someday betray him,…”
With all due respect,
Yen Hui, I don’t believe I have ever said that.
Nor do I believe it now.
What I said was that both Ed Parker and Olaf Simon grew.
And as they grew they changed their martial art.
But that Ed could admit to his changes and Olaf could not.
More importantly, Ed’s former students still speak of him with high praise.
I have NEVER found a detractor.
Cam, you posted, “
I find it very sad that Ed Parker had to put all that work into his system and then pass it down to no one. All he did was to ensure the fragmentation of his system and perhaps it's eventual demise!
And for what, greed, paranoia a self-inflated ego?
I have a lot of respect for what Ed Parker did, except for that statement!”
GMEP passed away suddenly and unexpectedly.
It is one of American Kenpo’s real struggles.
How do they keep the system from fragmenting?
Perhaps they need to form a council?
I don’t know and I know that I don't know
Nor do I wish to stir up that particular controversy.
It is only because it impacts directly on Mo Kempo and Pai hu Shi that I have brought this up, at all.
But your conclusions are not accurate.
As I said at the beginning of this post.
I believe you have misunderstood me here.
My apologies to all for any confusion
Regards, MrE2Me2
Without prejudice
E&OE